<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New: LongDescription 0.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvtagger.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/new-longdescription-00/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvtagger.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/new-longdescription-00/</link>
	<description>For all your tagging needs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:59:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://tvtagger.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/new-longdescription-00/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 16:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvtagger.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/new-longdescription-00/#comment-218</guid>
		<description>Would anyone be interested in having Tagger have the ability to set a long description on a custom &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UUID&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;uuid atom&lt;/a&gt;? It won&#039;t be read by iTunes in any way, but it may be interesting to support...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would anyone be interested in having Tagger have the ability to set a long description on a custom <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UUID" rel="nofollow">uuid atom</a>? It won&#8217;t be read by iTunes in any way, but it may be interesting to support&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://tvtagger.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/new-longdescription-00/#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvtagger.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/new-longdescription-00/#comment-217</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s perfectly safe and easy to use, and I know I&#039;ll continue to use it. But for the record, it is almost a sure thing that it will never be incorporated into AtomicParsley.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s perfectly safe and easy to use, and I know I&#8217;ll continue to use it. But for the record, it is almost a sure thing that it will never be incorporated into AtomicParsley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://tvtagger.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/new-longdescription-00/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 03:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvtagger.wordpress.com/2006/10/28/new-longdescription-00/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be honest, I&#039;m not that comfortable using DOS to add the long descriptions.

You know what, I was the one that suggested this, and I&#039;ll be the one to kill my suggestion.  I&#039;ll just wait for it to be properly incorporated into AtomicParsley, just like every other feature.

And like what you said, you might tag the wrong file.  And I want to be able to edit my Long description, like every other feature in Tagger already.

I guess I&#039;m a little TOO eager to have every tag incorporated into Tagger.

So there it is everyone, the truth, boy was it (the suggestion for the Long Description) a bad idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be honest, I&#8217;m not that comfortable using DOS to add the long descriptions.</p>
<p>You know what, I was the one that suggested this, and I&#8217;ll be the one to kill my suggestion.  I&#8217;ll just wait for it to be properly incorporated into AtomicParsley, just like every other feature.</p>
<p>And like what you said, you might tag the wrong file.  And I want to be able to edit my Long description, like every other feature in Tagger already.</p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m a little TOO eager to have every tag incorporated into Tagger.</p>
<p>So there it is everyone, the truth, boy was it (the suggestion for the Long Description) a bad idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
